Morrison made the comment only once, in a short essay in the New
Yorker in the aftermath of the Monica Lewinsky scandal and impending
presidential impeachment proceedings. As far as I could find, she has never used
the phrase again and has not disseminated it beyond the New Yorker piece. Her
words have been used frequently and almost always out of their original context,
as a way of signaling Bill Clinton's supposed comfort with and advocacy for
black people, to the extent that Hillary Clinton even attempted to joke that she
was "in this interracial marriage."
A look at the context of the words at the source is illuminating. Morrison
began by describing a nation glued to unseemly details of Bill Clinton's
relationship with Monica Lewinsky, as Kenneth Starr pursued his investigation
and Republicans cheered him on. She questioned the pitch of Starr-fueled
hysteria, and said: "Years ago, in the middle of the Whitewater investigation,
one heard the first murmurs: white skin notwithstanding, this is our first black
President. Blacker than any actual black person who could ever be elected in our
children's lifetime. . . .The always and already guilty 'perp' is being hunted
down not by a prosecutor's obsessive application of law but by a different kind
of pursuer, one who makes new laws out of the shards of those he
Over the years, this context has been forgotten and Bill Clinton's alleged "blackness" has been attributed to his Southern roots, his saxophone playing, his being the progeny of a deadbeat daddy and his inability to keep Little Bill in his trousers. In essence, people (disturbingly, mostly black people in my experience) have made Clinton a black man because of the more negative aspects of his story. The idea is offensive and demonstrates the level of self hate ingrained in black culture. (I have yet to hear anyone say: Wow! Bill Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. He must be really smart. Why, it's almost as if he is a black man.)
The unexamined belief that Bill Clinton more than likes black people, he IS a black person, also keeps the black community from realistically evaluating the Clinton legacy as it relates to African Americans.
We should also ask real questions about the Clinton legacy vis a visLet's get this straight: Bill Clinton is a white man and has enjoyed all of the privileges of being one. As president, he ushered in an era of prosperity for Americans, including people of color. He appointed an unprecedented number of black people to his Cabinet, but it should be noted, President Bush II put black people in positions of real power. The Clintons have long had close alliances with the lions of the civil rights movement. However, this presidential race demonstrates that neither Clinton is uncomfortable trading on race if it helps them. The Clintons may have been good to black people, but they are not above reproach.
African-Americans, instead of accepting uncritically that they have always
worked to advance the interests of black people. We shouldn't forget the fates
of Lani Guinier and Jocelyn Elder, for instance, as we evaluate President
Clinton's record in advancing African-American appointees.
We do ourselves no favors by passing out honorary "black cards." It is better to evaluate politicians, including the self-identified black man who is currently running for president, with clear-eyed realism. What policies will the candidates before us enact to make this country better for everyone? That is the ultimate question.
See also: "Why do black folks love the Clintons so much?" here.
God, I hate to agree with Christopher Hitchens, but... here. (Note, he does get the Toni Morrison thing all wrong.)