Friday, January 18, 2008

Do you boogie?

When the Clinton campaign unleashed its followers to attack Barack Obama's loyalty to the black community, it demonstrated (Karl) Rovian shrewdness. Clinton is tapping on Obama's Achilles heel. For what is a successful person of color accepted by the mainstream to do? If Obama sets out to prove his blackness--as if it needs to be proven--by calling in to black radio talk shows, hanging in the pulpits of black churches and dropping by barbershops in the hood--his race will become too apparent for many white voters. He'll start looking like an Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson, and we all know how their presidential campaigns ended.

But this isn't just about race.

Hillary Clinton has a similar Achilles heel--gender. Many of the panelists on last night's Black Women's Roundtable (listen using the widget in the right-hand column) believe that Obama holds the black community at arms length. If that is so, then Clinton can be accused of holding women at arm's length. How often does she address "women's" issues--reproductive rights, the wage gap, violence against women, sexism? How often does she talk about being a woman and the disadvantages that brings in a patriarchal society. I bet it's not easy being a girl in the Congressional boys' club. But too much woman talk turns a viable candidate into a man-hating, hairy-pitted "feminazi."

Obama and Clinton both do the dance that people of color and women who achieve success in a racist and patriarchal society must learn. Women of color know it particularly well. Call it the race-gender boogie, a delicate two-step where the dancer is true to herself and her culture, but not too much, lest she be seen as "different" and not fit it.

A-one and a-two and a-step, shimmy, step...

The boogie requires letting numerous race- or gender-based slights go, but not too many. The dancer must find a comfortable fit between being seen as prickly and overly-sensitive and being the clueless token who laughs along with noose and "dumb broad" jokes.

During the Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill scandal, I never got the people who marveled that Hill hadn't raised a stink and made complaints on Thomas while in his employ. I understood very well why she stayed silent.

A-three and a-four and jazz hands...

For some people of color, the boogie requires code switching, stifling an accent, making speech crisper, to be seen as "clean and articulate." I heard some radio announcer smarmily point out that Oprah and Obama sounded "different" when addressing black crowds in South Carolina. Of course they did.

A-five and a-six and twirl and dip...
For a woman, the boogie means being aggressive enough to get ahead, but not so aggressive that people perceive her as bitchy and cold. And I don't need to tell you that a bitchy and cold man is called a hell of a businessman or a good proactive student or a real go-getter...never a bitch.

And a-seven and eight and tap ball change...

And if you are "the only" the dance gets really intricate. Try being the only black male professional in a company where every other person of color is support staff, or security or maintenance. I do not demean those positions, which are valuable, honest work. But we all recognize the hierarchy in corporate America. So does a black executive spend most of his time being chummy with those at or above his corporate "station?" That's what his white counterparts will do. But how then to answer the charges of "siddity" or "sell out" or "bourgie" from blacks in the office, eager for signs that the black exec is still "down" with his people?

And a-nine and a-ten...and big finish!

That's the race-gender boogie, my friends. I should note, gay men and women know how to do a mean boogie, too. Can you blame a member of any marginalized group for participating in the dance?

I was listening to a black political talk show on Sirius yesterday. Some members of the civil rights industrial complex (TM What About Our Daughters) were challenging Obama's blackness and calling for him to spend more time with old guard black community leaders and more time talking about black issues. But I am convinced that if he does this, he will surely lose the Democratic nomination. And what will the black community have won?

The fact that Hillary Clinton can go down to South Carolina and rub elbows with black leaders and chat about racism, does not mean that she cares more about black folks. It just means the race boogie isn't hers to dance.

Should black voters simply accept that Obama has a civil rights plank to his political platform and also addresses things like universal health care, poverty and education that greatly impact black Americans, and not ask him to make a misstep in the dance to prove his loyalty to us?

What is the right thing for Obama to do to both address black voters and run a winning campaign?

Do you boogie? If so, which boogie do you do?

And because I always have to give my candidate some time, here is John Edwards' platform for ending predatory mortgages.

11 comments:

Mes Deux Cents said...

Tami,

First, wow you have Sirius. I have been debating if I want to get that. Is it worth the money?

In your comment on my blog you said our post were on the same subject but from different angles. I'm not so sure that's the case.

I think that we are making the same point. The difference is that you have drawn a conclusion about how Obama's Blackness will affect the race and I am trying to come to a conclusion.

Your post has helped me to get nearer to a conclusion. But my question is; if Obama has to do the two-step now, won't he have to keep doing the two-step if he's elected?

Will he have to continue to avoid being to racially tune in? After all if he wins he will want to be re-elected.

See my point?

Mes Deux Cents said...

Should be; Will he have to continue to avoid being too racially tuned in?

Tami said...

MDC,

First...Sirius it totally worth the money. I am hooked now and even my Year of Conscious Living can't pry my Sirius from my hands. (lol)It's about $12/month. The music channels are okay. There's one called The Coffee House that has introduced me to lots of great mellow music. Have you listened to Ray LaMontagne? I find myself listening to talk and news even more. They've got two NPRs, plus BBC World News, the Martha Stewart Channel and Talk Left...Yeah, after my iPod, the Sirius is my consumer addiction.

Back to the matter at hand...(lol)

See...I don't know that Obama isn't racially tuned in. And I agree with you that the dance doesn't stop once he's in office.

It really all comes down to policies.If his platform includes things that benefit black people, what else matters? (Not saying they are or not.) Aren't his policies proof enough of his loyalty?

That's what troubles me about some of the charges that Obama is not engaged with the black community. The people pointing the finger (and I'm talking about the folks that were calling in to the Sirius radio show) weren't talking about his lack of policies for black folks, they were complaining cause he hadn't come down to the local Baptist church for the Friday fish fry or that he hadn't kissed the ring of Al Sharpton or other entrenched local black leaders. Why must he do those things to prove his blackness?

I voted for Obama for senator when I lived in Chicago. I was a member of his church, Trinity United Church of Christ, whose motto is "unashamedly black and unapologetically Christian." I think he has been engaged in the black community in the ways that count. Everything else, like Hillary Clinton's pandering, is just showbiz.

I tell you one thing, this presidential campaign is giving me a headache already. I mean, it's exciting, but I feel like I'm in a constant state of hyped-upedness. There's Gloria Steinem over here talking smack. Bob Johnson over there. Every other day there is something for me to wring my hands about. It's gonna be a loooooong 10months to November!

Symphony said...

I didnt hear the podcast last night.

Its getting to the point of ridiculousness. I'm working on a post caled "The Responsible Voter". And one of the commandments is that one will know what is good for them without someone having to state their demographic.

For instance, Obama has addressed unequal justice and the department of justice. Most Black women hear that and automatically think thats a Black man issue. No its a Black issue because not only are our husbands, brothers and fathers dealing with this--we are when they are locked up AND we as Black women are because the rate of incarceration for Black women is skyrocketing.

I dont need a flashing sign that says "Black people" or "Black woman" this bills for you.

As voters we need to do a bit more maturing.

All three candidates have plans for predatory subprime mortgages that I linked to in my post about subprime loans earlier this week.

Now, this affects the poor, most definitely Blacks and at a scary rate--Black women.

Now Black voters need to be mature enough to know these bills will help Black people without the candidates needing to say "Hey Black people..."

Mes Deux Cents said...

Symphony,

You make really good points about being more perceptive as voters.

I look forward to your post on the subject.

That's kind of what I was trying to figure out in my post yesterday. I think many who commented thought I was trying to define Barack's Blackness.

I was trying to decipher how he might deal with racial issues once in office. Will he gloss over them or will he react?

I was trying to determine if Barack was giving the Black community the "wink and a nod" in the same way republicans give it to Southern voters.

I'm trying to look at actions as opposed to just rhetoric from the candidates.

Symphony said...

I was trying to determine if Barack was giving the Black community the "wink and a nod" in the same way republicans give it to Southern voters.

Great comment MDC. I think he does it but too many Black folk aren't paying attention.

tasha212 said...

I always say that Obama is in a precarious position. He cannot come out forcefully for "black" issues. He needs a contingency of the white vote to win the nomination. But how is this going to translate once he gets into office? Are we supposed to expect that Obama's going to get into office and all of a sudden start concerning himself with the problems that ordinary working-class and middle-class black people face? Probably not. As for Tiger, I've said this time and time again, he does not consider himself to be black. He does not identify with the black experience. So therefore he may know that something is offensive but he doesn't identify with the offense and therefore can easily dismiss it.

Tasha
www.thesowingcircle.blogspot.com

Professor Tracey said...

"Race Boogie" What a great new phrase. Awesome! I love it.

I want Sirius as well, but the year of living broke has already begun.

No comment on being black enough or woman enough. I am sick of that debate. I'm a black woman all day, everyday, my personal feelings about that will decide which candidate is going to meet those needs.

Bradski said...

Tami,

I agree. I think it's a bit ludicrous to think that Obama isn't tuned in racially given that he started his career as a community activist and served 8 years in the Illinois Senate serving a predominately African-American district.

Obama has to compete for the presidency not the "black" presidency. I don't understand why people continue to be naive about how American politics work.

The Clinton campaign decided to follow up on Bill's Sistah Souljah routine by attacking Obama on multiple fronts racially. The did a little dance and had a little romance with their racist tendencies to dislodge potential white voters from thinking of Obama as a "person" into thinking of him as a stereotypical, scary "black man."

It worked for them.

Again, this is why I hate to hear Bill Clinton referred to as the first black president. Bullshit. No one ever threw this kind of racist crap his way.

Hillary Clinton may just win the nomination. Fine. Dandy. She'll have done so by continuing the use of racist, anti-black rhetoric just as venal as the Republican's use of the Southern Strategy (most recently used against Harold Ford--one of the most conservative Democrats).

As I watch people like Andrew Young and many of the older Civil Rights leaders continue to snuggle up to the Clintons, I find myself nauseous, wanting to retch. How can these people who fought hard to be treated as adult men and women not admonish or distance themselves from the Clinton anti-black rhetoric. Instead, they smile, laugh, and kiss the Clintons' cheeks.

The literary character Uncle Tom was a man who was FORCED to be nice to masters. He was a slave. He had no choice. Bob Johnson and Andrew Young had a choice in the statements that they made. They are wealthy men over 60 years old.
What more do can they gain? Isn't a billion dollars enough Bob Johnson?

It's one thing to support Clinton because one believes in her policies but it's another thing to attack Obama because of his blackness. Young and Johnson did that. Bill Clinton is "black" because he slept with more black women than Barack Obama? That's "clowning," Andrew Young? No, that's disgusting racist, sexist crap.

I'm sure Thomas Jefferson and his slave holding brethren slept with more black women than Barack Obama. Does that make slaver owners "black," Andrew Young?

If Hillary Clinton wins the nomination, I may be forced to vote her because I can't vote for a politician. But if I do so, I know that my vote would be for a politician that is willing to debase African-Americans to win white voters. On second thought, I live in a "liberal" state and I probably would write in John Edwards or Barack Obama.

I'm tired of that. I'm tired of Republicans using racism and I'm tired of Democrats using racism to win. What does that teach our children? O.K. kids, our president is a nice lady who is willing to have her buddies say horrible racist things about black (or mulatto in this case) folks to win votes. But she really cares about us! (And, see that man Bob Johnson, she rubbed his head for good luck! That's how she really won!)

Blech!

Finally, I take umbrage at Clinton trying to compare herself to Lyndon Johnson. Johnson was a deeply flawed man but when his butt was on the line, he delivered for African- Americans. The man really cared and didn't throw African-Americans over to score points to win white votes. Quite the opposite, Johnson got the most important Civil Rights legislation through the legislature and got Thurgood Marshall confirmed on the Supreme Court. Doing all of this took a great toll on him (as did his regrettable decisions on the Vietnam War).

What exactly has Hillary Clinton or Bill Clinton done that was so great for people of color? Can anyone point to any great economic or social reform that either Clinton engineered?

I can't stand most so-called "black conservatives." However, I think they do have a point. People like the Clintons will continue to treat African-Americans poorly because they know that, in the end, African-Americans know that there is no other party (person or organization) for whom we can vote. We can't vote for Republicans because they're straight up anti-black. So, that leaves us stuck with them.

I wish that John Edwards had been more successful or can turn things around quickly. He's campaigned without using racist tactics and had an inclusive plan for all Americans. I could vote for him easily.

It would make me very happy to see a hard fought Democratic convention wherein Edwards and Obama got together and put their delegates to serve either one of them for the nomination.

KimcheeBrown said...

I've showed up late to the party, but I wanted to add a "mature voter" perspective for what it's worth. All shucking and jiving and pandering aside (did anyone see the debates - Frederick Douglass is one of Hillary Clinton's personal heroes?? N***a please), there is a real race issue in the Democratic party this election year and everyone seems to have missed it.

What strikes me as most significant vis a vis the race/gender identity of our next president is how that leader will be perceived abroad on account of his/her race or gender.

Two thoughts occur to me: first, that the United States will do itself a great service in the credibility department by electing a black man president. The arrogant ruse of barging into every corner of the globe demanding that foreign governments appease their minority factions to disguise the fact that our own hegemony is built on centuries of brutal and systematic racial oppression has grown a bit transparent and infuriating to our neighbors. It's time this country makes amends. The global community has developed an increasingly fervent desire to see America punished for its hubris and hypocrisy. Electing a black man president would be the first positive moral example we've set in a long time.

Secondly, do you really think Musharraf n' em are going to take kindly to Hillary Clinton stomping onto their battlefield telling them what they can do with their big guns or else?! What do you think their reaction might be?

I don't care if he ever sets foot in a Baptist church or Harold's Chicken again. I think Barack is black enough for Al Quaeda...and that might be the most important issue for all of us in this election.

Tami said...

Cousin,

You make a good point. I don't think a black president alone is enough to repair our country's reputation on the world stage, but I do imagine some of the colonized would find it refreshing not to have to deal with a colonizer as head of state.

As for Hillary, some world leaders will likely have qualms about negotiating with a woman. But they'll have to get over it, like they did with Margaret Thatcher. Hated her politics, but they didn't call her The Iron Lady for nothing.

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...