Thursday, December 18, 2008

Mad at Barack

It had to happen. Politicians all tend to disappoint eventually--even the best of them. You just can't please all of the people all of the time. And today, I am not pleased with my President-elect.

Have you seen Barack Obama's inaugural program?

Musical Selections - The United States Marine Band

Musical Selections - The San Francisco Boys Chorus and the San Francisco Girls Chorus

Call to Order and Welcoming Remarks - The Honorable Dianne Feinstein

Invocation - Dr. Rick Warren, Saddleback Church, Lake Forest, CA

Musical Selection - Aretha Franklin

Oath of Office Administered to Vice President-elect Joseph R. Biden, Jr. - Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, Hon. John Paul Stevens

Musical Selection - John Williams, composer/arranger

Itzhak Perlman, Violin

Yo-Yo Ma, Cello

Gabriela Montero, Piano

Anthony McGill, Clarinet

Oath of Office Administered to President-elect Barack H. Obama - Chief Justice of the United States, Hon. John G. Roberts, Jr.

Inaugural Address - The President of the United States, Hon. Barack H. Obama

Poem - Elizabeth Alexander

Benediction - The Reverend Dr. Joseph E. Lowery

The National Anthem - The United States Navy Band "Sea Chanters"

I had hoped that the Obama inauguration might bring some youth and modernity to the inaugural program--maybe a jazz performance or something--but this appears to be the same old, same old. (On the other hand, for the first time in history a gay and lesbian organization will march in the inaugural parade.) But my entertainment criticism is just a trifle--not my real beef. How did Rick Warren find his way on to the stage--anti-choice, anti-female equality, anti-gay rights, anti-stem cell research, pastor of Saddleback Church Rick Warren?

Okay, that question is disingenuous. I know how and why Warren is part of the presidential inauguration. Barack Obama has pledged to be a unifier, which is especially important with the hard road the country has ahead. An olive branch may give some moderate Republicans incentive to support Obama on key issues in the future. Our 44th president wants to send a message to Evangelicals and others on the right that he is their president, too. That's okay--admirable even. I wish that President Bush had done more of that instead of sniping about "liberals" as if folks like me were simply barnacles on the bums of the country's real citizenry. But there is unification and then there is pandering and kowtowing. When a Democratic president-elect embraces a figure that stands in opposition to fundamental progressive ideals, he is in danger of doing the latter. We don't have to demonize the opposition, but this...this seems like a step too far.

I know there ain't no way there will be a black liberation theology-spouting preacher on stage come Jan. 20, but the United Church of Christ, the denomination of Rev. Jeremiah Wright and until recently the Obama family is known for its devotion to social justice, civil rights and "open and affirming" churches that welcome GLBT members. Why not invite a UCC pastor onto the stage or a Unitarian Universalist or someone else who proves that Christianity is not the antithesis of liberalism?

Though my fellow progressives are losing their minds over this, I concede that it isn't a huge deal in the scheme of things. Warren is coming on stage to say a few words during a ceremonial event; he's not joining the Cabinet and making policy. I can get over it. But feints to the right can be costly gambles. Obama should be careful not to alienate his own base while trying to soothe another. And at some point, folks will either get on board or they won't.

The Field Negro said it well:

But you know what O man? At some point these other folks--- you know the ones who didn't vote for you-- -are just going to have to get over the fact that you won. And if you do a good job as their president, all these little tokenized (I made that word up) acts and the symbolism that goes along with them won't be necessary, because their lives will be better than it was before you became POTUS.

8 comments:

MacDaddy said...

Tami: It's get real time. Obama says he's reaching out "to the other side" to hear all points of views, and to be president of all Americans. But everyone knows there is a limit to reaching out. Would Obama reach to that super-racist Aryan Nation and invite them to parcitate in his inaugural program?
How about a member of a Nazi group?

Members of the gay community must be asking that question? And a lot of us are disappointed in Barack over this. But this must hit the gay community hard. After all, LGBT community gave him solidly support. And all they get is the recognition that they have been used by yet another centrist politician and to ride in parade? F... that!

Barack is not just reaching out. He's giving in too much and too often.

Lady C said...

I don't care for Rick Warren, and I do believe Obama made a mistake in choosing him to be a part of the inauguration. I intend to ignore him when he gives the invocation.

With that said, I am really getting a bit pissed off with everyone behaving like "gay is the new black," because it isn't.

rjweems said...

Thanks Tami for your comments. I hate Obama's choice of Rick Warren to give an inauguaral prayer (and not just because of his stand on gay rights), but I haven't been able to say exactly why I hate it. I'll be blogging myself it today.

bradski said...

Lady C,

It's not a question of "gay being the new black," as much as could you imagine if a Republican had chosen a minister who said similar things about people of color then dismissed people's concerns as Obama has?

I know that there is often a comparison between gay marriage and interracial marriage. That's actually wrong. The real comparison should be comparing the time of slavery when African-American slaves could not legally marry and familes could be torn apart and sold.

The law and society did not see marriage between blacks as legal. Their families meant nothing.

Rick Warren's view of gays is similarly dehumanizing. He doesn't think gay people deserve basic human rights!

Warren belives that being gay is either a choice or an immature inability to fail to sublimate desires. He refuses to recognize the humanity within gays.

So, no, I don't agree with Obama's invitation to Warren. I find it shockingly ignorant, cynical, and disrespectful. It's the kind of action that I would expect from Bill Clinton or Karl Rove.

The reality is that Obama has angered a substantial portion of his base. And for what? Hopes to appease bigots? What's the endgame? Obama got two-thirds of the gay vote. This is how he rewards them?

Imagine Obama had invited Lou Dobbs or a member of the Minute Men to speak at his inauguration? Given their history of anti-Latino bigotry, could you imagine Obama inviting either to speak?

Anonymous said...

Grow up already.

Lady C said...

bradski, I started my comment with: "I don't care for Rick Warren, and I do believe Obama made a mistake in choosing him to be a part of the inauguration. I intend to ignore him when he gives the invocation."

I understand what you are saying, but I still say the LGBT's narrative is not the same as the African American's narrative in this country. To say so, in my opinion, is offensive to African Americans.

I lived through segregation, so I know what this coutry is all about. I didn't get it from the history books. I'm not a "Johnny Come Lately" to the scene. I've been black all my life.

MomTFH said...

Rick Warren does not let homosexuals join his congregation. It even says so on the church website (or did as of yesterday.)

I think we should turn our backs on him like we did on Phyllis Schafly.

MomTFH said...

Sorry, I spelled her name wrong.

I should have typed "Phyllis Schlafly".

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...